|
||||||
|
|
952 views
Joseph Phillips, PMP: Creating the Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)
The smallest item in the WBS, that is the lowest decomposed deliverable, is called the work package. I know what you’re thinking (maybe). If the WBS is not about activities then why is it called a Work Breakdown Structure – and why is the smallest element a work package? Good question! When we think of “work” we often think of labor – like I’m working on a report. Work can also be a noun – like the works of Mozart or the works of Picasso. When it comes to the WBS you should think of work as a noun rather than as a series of activities.
The process of decomposing the project scope begins with the high-level project deliverables: such as the project management deliverables, the foundation, the framing, and so. Then each top tier deliverable is decomposed again and again until you’ve reached the smallest level of deliverables – the work packages. Here’s a tip: you know that you have decomposed the project deliverables deep enough by using the 8/80 Rule. The 8/80 Rule means that each work package can be completed with not less than 8 hours of labor and not more than 80 hours of labor.
Just as each project scope statement is unique so too must each WBS be unique. Having said that, it is acceptable to use a WBS from a previous similar project and adapt it to your current project as a WBS template. Some organizations have a consistent level of deliverables with all of their projects so they use a pre-populated template to reflect these “every project” deliverables. For example, you might create a template that reflects your project management plans, quality control charts, and expected reports that the project will generate.
The numbering system is known as a code of accounts. Each WBS deliverable is identified and can be tracked by time, cost, and other metrics using the code of accounts. The code of accounts can also help facilitate communication between the project manager and the project team. Imagine trying to identify which bedroom a contract is discussing in a four-bedroom home construction project. The WBS code of accounts can point all parties to the exact deliverable using the numbering system for each component.
Along with the WBS you’ll create a companion document called the WBS Dictionary. The WBS Dictionary is a document that defines all of the details for each of work packages. It defines what the work package is, the owner of the work, contract information (if warranted), technical references, and cost information for each work package. The project scope statement, the WBS, and the WBS dictionary all serve as the project’s scope baseline.
The approach that I’ve outlined here is the most common – deliverables are decomposed into smaller deliverables down to the work packages. There is, however, another approach which is just as acceptable – to decompose the phases of the projects into the work packages. For example, an IT project may have identified phases such as requirements gathering, development, testing, training, and roll-out. A project team could elect to decompose the project by these phases rather than by the major deliverables of the project. In either method the project manager will be using the WBS throughout the project. The WBS is needed in order to do five key project management activities:
Related posts:
2 comments to Joseph Phillips, PMP: Creating the Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) |
|||||
|
Copyright © 2010 PMHUB.net Blog - All Rights Reserved
PMHUB.net® is registered mark.
All rights reserved.
This site contains registered marks which are the property of their respective owners, and those owners are in no way affiliated with PMHUB®.
"PMI", "PMP", "CAPM"and "PMBOK" are registered marks of the Project Management Institute, Inc.
If you are the owner of a trademark, certification mark or service mark found on this website and you feel that your ownership has not been adequately acknowledged, send an email to pmhub@pmhub.net explaining your concerns.
No part of this website may be reproduced in any material form or transmitted to any other person without the prior written permission of PMHUB. 204 queries. 0.546 seconds. |
||||||
Excellent post, I’m glad to see you are making a point that the WBS does not include tasks, just deliverables and that stakeholders should be involved in the creation of the WBS!
I do disagree that using phases at level 2 is a valid way of doing a WBS. I know many disagree with me on this, but I’ve seen how that method can cause problems by taking your focus off the unique deliverable(s) being produced and get you thinking about time-phasing too early.
Josh Nankivel
WBS Coach Instructor
http://WBSCoach.com
I agree with Josh. Time-phasing should not be built in a WBS. The WBS should contain info re: pieces that would be needed to build a product like when you are building a bicycle or car.
Randy Tangco