<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Joseph Phillips, PMP: Creating the Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pmhub.net/wp/2009/12/joseph-phillips-pmp-creating-the-work-breakdown-structure-wbs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pmhub.net/wp/2009/12/joseph-phillips-pmp-creating-the-work-breakdown-structure-wbs/</link>
	<description>Project Management Certification - CAPM, PMP, PgMP, PMI-SP, PMI-RMP</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 12:46:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Tangco</title>
		<link>http://www.pmhub.net/wp/2009/12/joseph-phillips-pmp-creating-the-work-breakdown-structure-wbs/comment-page-1/#comment-536</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Tangco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 14:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pmhub.net/wp/?p=1202#comment-536</guid>
		<description>I agree with Josh.  Time-phasing should not be built in a WBS.  The WBS should contain info re: pieces that would be needed to build a product like when you are building a bicycle or car.

Randy Tangco</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Josh.  Time-phasing should not be built in a WBS.  The WBS should contain info re: pieces that would be needed to build a product like when you are building a bicycle or car.</p>
<p>Randy Tangco</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Nankivel</title>
		<link>http://www.pmhub.net/wp/2009/12/joseph-phillips-pmp-creating-the-work-breakdown-structure-wbs/comment-page-1/#comment-528</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Nankivel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 17:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pmhub.net/wp/?p=1202#comment-528</guid>
		<description>Excellent post, I&#039;m glad to see you are making a point that the WBS does not include tasks, just deliverables and that stakeholders should be involved in the creation of the WBS!

I do disagree that using phases at level 2 is a valid way of doing a WBS.  I know many disagree with me on this, but I&#039;ve seen how that method can cause problems by taking your focus off the unique deliverable(s) being produced and get you thinking about time-phasing too early.

Josh Nankivel
WBS Coach Instructor
http://WBSCoach.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post, I&#8217;m glad to see you are making a point that the WBS does not include tasks, just deliverables and that stakeholders should be involved in the creation of the WBS!</p>
<p>I do disagree that using phases at level 2 is a valid way of doing a WBS.  I know many disagree with me on this, but I&#8217;ve seen how that method can cause problems by taking your focus off the unique deliverable(s) being produced and get you thinking about time-phasing too early.</p>
<p>Josh Nankivel<br />
WBS Coach Instructor<br />
<a href="http://WBSCoach.com" rel="nofollow">http://WBSCoach.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
