<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sharon Yuen: Passed PMP on 23 Feb, 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pmhub.net/wp/2010/02/sharon-yuen-passed-pmp-on-23-feb-2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pmhub.net/wp/2010/02/sharon-yuen-passed-pmp-on-23-feb-2010/</link>
	<description>Project Management Certification - CAPM, PMP, PgMP, PMI-SP, PMI-RMP</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 04:25:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hal</title>
		<link>http://www.pmhub.net/wp/2010/02/sharon-yuen-passed-pmp-on-23-feb-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-689</link>
		<dc:creator>Hal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 23:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pmhub.net/wp/?p=1380#comment-689</guid>
		<description>And this is the reason I read www.pmhub.net. Nice posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And this is the reason I read <a href="http://www.pmhub.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.pmhub.net</a>. Nice posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharon</title>
		<link>http://www.pmhub.net/wp/2010/02/sharon-yuen-passed-pmp-on-23-feb-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-665</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 06:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pmhub.net/wp/?p=1380#comment-665</guid>
		<description>Hi Peter,

Thanks! just to clarify further for the following comment.

&quot;rated this 4 because some questions are ambiguous and/or have 4 correct answers...&quot;

I am referring to PMStudy test 2,3 &amp; 4. Some test takers also have similar comment on the PMStudy simulation tests. I found that the following link to the PMP product ratings is quite helpful.

http://www.pmhub.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=79&amp;t=13991

Regards,
Sharon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Peter,</p>
<p>Thanks! just to clarify further for the following comment.</p>
<p>&#8220;rated this 4 because some questions are ambiguous and/or have 4 correct answers&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>I am referring to PMStudy test 2,3 &amp; 4. Some test takers also have similar comment on the PMStudy simulation tests. I found that the following link to the PMP product ratings is quite helpful.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pmhub.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=79&#038;t=13991" rel="nofollow">http://www.pmhub.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=79&#038;t=13991</a></p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Sharon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Buck, PMP</title>
		<link>http://www.pmhub.net/wp/2010/02/sharon-yuen-passed-pmp-on-23-feb-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-664</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Buck, PMP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 02:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pmhub.net/wp/?p=1380#comment-664</guid>
		<description>Sharon, congratulations on passing. Welcome to the ranks.

I, too, thought Rita&#039;s book was poorly organized without very much explanatory behind the rationale for an answer (the whole reason I&#039;m studying the book is to understand, not be brow-beaten for not understanding the logic).  I&#039;ve spoken with others who&#039;ve expressed similar concerns.  While I&#039;ll highly regard FastTrack as a simulator, with all due respect to Ms. Mulcahy, she spends much more time showing the reader how much she knows rather than successfully imparting that knowledge (again, isn&#039;t that the purpose behind learning?).

I&#039;d definitely agree with your other assessments, but I&#039;ve also found Kim Heldman&#039;s work very useful, and lacking much of Rita&#039;s sarcasm.

Regards,
Andy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sharon, congratulations on passing. Welcome to the ranks.</p>
<p>I, too, thought Rita&#8217;s book was poorly organized without very much explanatory behind the rationale for an answer (the whole reason I&#8217;m studying the book is to understand, not be brow-beaten for not understanding the logic).  I&#8217;ve spoken with others who&#8217;ve expressed similar concerns.  While I&#8217;ll highly regard FastTrack as a simulator, with all due respect to Ms. Mulcahy, she spends much more time showing the reader how much she knows rather than successfully imparting that knowledge (again, isn&#8217;t that the purpose behind learning?).</p>
<p>I&#8217;d definitely agree with your other assessments, but I&#8217;ve also found Kim Heldman&#8217;s work very useful, and lacking much of Rita&#8217;s sarcasm.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Andy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.pmhub.net/wp/2010/02/sharon-yuen-passed-pmp-on-23-feb-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-662</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pmhub.net/wp/?p=1380#comment-662</guid>
		<description>Sharon,
Congrats for clearing PMP !!!!. In your LL you have written &quot; rated this 4 because some questions are ambiguous and/or have 4 correct answers. You may like to try 2 &amp; 3 first&quot;  Are you referring to Oliver Lehmann (75 + 175)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sharon,<br />
Congrats for clearing PMP !!!!. In your LL you have written &#8221; rated this 4 because some questions are ambiguous and/or have 4 correct answers. You may like to try 2 &amp; 3 first&#8221;  Are you referring to Oliver Lehmann (75 + 175)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

